πŸ“Š phoenix Γ— data-platform

Ship data platform on Phoenix with sensible defaults.

Phoenix is a Elixir workable choice for data platform. GreatCTO auto-detects both β€” adds the data-platform archetype overlay, wires data-platform-specific gates, and runs 83 specialist agents around your existing Phoenix workflow.

What changes when GreatCTO joins your Phoenix project

Detection β†’ overlay β†’ gates β†’ reviewers.

1 Β· DETECT

Stack + archetype

GreatCTO reads your mix.exs and detects phoenix + data-platform archetype from signals: imports, file structure, env vars, README hints.

2 Β· OVERLAY

Archetype pack

Attaches the data-platform archetype overlay: archetype-specific reviewer + compliance gates. Override if your specifics differ; the defaults are sensible for Phoenix-style projects.

3 Β· GATES

Phoenix-aware reviewers

qa-engineer runs mix test --cover / credo --strict; security-officer audits Ecto query injection + Phoenix CSRF; performance-engineer profiles BEAM scheduler + Ecto pool.

4 Β· MEMORY

Cross-project lessons

Bugs you've hit before in other Phoenix projects (connection-pool exhaustion, ORM N+1 queries, retry storms) β€” the agent's Step 0 includes the prior detection order. MTTR drops 94 % on second occurrence (methodology).

First 10 minutes

Concrete walkthrough.

$ cd my-phoenix-app && npx great-cto init
βœ“ scanning manifests… found manifest
βœ“ stack: phoenix (Elixir)
βœ“ archetype: data-platform
⚠ archetype + stack combo is unusual β€” review overlay manually
βœ“ 83 agents ready

$ /start "add data-platform feature"
β–Έ architect drafting ARCH-data-platform.md…
β–Έ pm decomposing into beads tasks…
⚐ gate:plan β€” your approval needed

Approve β†’ 3 senior-devs run in parallel worktrees β†’ 5 reviewers fan out in parallel β†’ gate:ship β†’ deploy. One real run walked stage-by-stage: /proof.

What ships

The first feature, Phoenix-idiomatic.

This is the shape of what senior-dev drafts for "data-platform feature" β€” auth first, schema validation, and the audit line the data-platform reviewer requires before gate:ship opens.

# lib/app_web/controllers/data_platform_controller.ex β€” reviewed by 5 agents
defmodule AppWeb.DataPlatformController do
  use AppWeb, :controller
  plug :require_authenticated_user            # security-officer: auth before handler

  def create(conn, params) do
    with {:ok, attrs} <- validate(params),     # qa-engineer: changeset enforced
         {:ok, result} <- DataPlatform.handle(attrs, conn.assigns.current_user) do
      AuditLog.record(conn.assigns.current_user.id, "data-platform feature", result.confidence) # gate:data-platform
      json(conn, result)
    end
  end
end
Where this combo lands

What teams build with Phoenix + the data-platform overlay.

1

dbt warehouses with model contracts and lineage.

2

Airflow / Spark pipelines with PII detection in logs.

3

BI layers with GDPR retention enforcement.

⚠ Honest caveat

Phoenix (Elixir) is not a typical fit for data platform. The archetype overlay still attaches, but you may want to override defaults more aggressively. Check the data-platform archetype page for the typical stack list and decide if your case is the right tool / right archetype.

Architecture

Every step of the pipeline, transparent.

No black-box "AI does it all" loop. GreatCTO is a deterministic state machine β€” 8 stages, 22 nodes, 2 human gates. Every node maps to a real agent on GitHub. Inspect the state machine β†’

Install

Phoenix + GreatCTO in one command.

$ npx great-cto init

Free, MIT, runs locally. Built as a Claude Code plugin β€” install with one command.

Related deep-dives

More from the blog

AI

How I designed the SDLC state machine for agentic coding

Eight stages, two human gates, four memory layers. Why this exact shape, and what I tried that didn't work.

AI

First real shipped feature with this stack β€” receipts

One run, one feature, from prompt to merged PR. Time, cost, and gate-by-gate breakdown β€” no marketing math.

AI

How GreatCTO chooses which compliance pack to attach

Regex vs LLM-based archetype detection, the false-positive count, and why I keep rejecting the obvious fix.

AI

Why your agent system fails: missing gates, not missing intelligence

The bottleneck in agentic SDLC isn't model quality β€” it's process governance. Here's the state machine that closes the gap.